Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Do we need a new world Order

Having "not wasted this crisis", Obama has a vision for you:
"Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail. So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners to it." (Barack Obama 06/04/2009, Source: WhiteHouse.gov)

Like his predecessors, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George H.W. Bush, Barack Obama envisions a global union, in which all nations are linked commercially, governmentally, and militarily. Bush One called it a "New World Order;" Bush Two called it an "international order;" Clinton often regurgitated Bush Sr.'s "New World Order" mantra; and Barack Obama called it a "world order." Do people not recognize that every President since Ronald Reagan (both Democrat and Republican) has called for an international one-world order? Obama's speech goes a step further, however.

In calling for a "world order," Obama blatantly said "Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation . . . over another will inevitably fail." Does everyone understand what Obama is saying? In order for this new "world order" to materialize, no individual nation can be preferred over another--not even our own. In a word, no country can be allowed to maintain national sovereignty, independence, military, or economic superiority. All nations must be willing to surrender their sovereignty and independence to the new "world order." Furthermore, all nations must be willing to submit their militaries to a new global military. All of this is inferred in Obama's statement.

The last half of Obama's statement is equally chilling: "Whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners to it." In other words, Americans must forget about the heritage and tradition of our past. The ideas of national sovereignty and independence are archaic. The notion of "America First" is passé. The principles of constitutional government must be replaced with the international principles of a new "world order."

It would not have mattered if John McCain had been elected President instead of Barack Obama. McCain repeatedly said that one of the first things he would do after becoming President would be to implement a new "League of Democracies." In fact, look no further than to a speech McCain made to the Hoover Institution. According to McCain, "The new League of Democracies would form the core of an international order." (Source: John McCain Addresses the Hoover Institution, CFR Publication, May 1, 2007)

At the national level, both the Republican and Democratic parties are taking the United States headlong into an international "New World Order." The national left leaning news media is likewise culpable, as are the vast majority of the Religious Right and most other religious entities, organizations, and movements.

The burning question facing the American people today is, are we going to do nothing as these globalists who control our political and corporate institutions sell our country into global tyranny?

Most people are sick of the lies, corruption and the spin on whom or what party is to blame for the problems we have today. Both Republicans and Democrats on all levels have been corrupted and need to come home. We need to elect new people that have a view that the government is not the answer but is the problem.